
Answer:
There are certain tests that can be used to detect if a person is infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus and others that can be used to determine if a person has developed some level of immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Unfortunately, there has been some confusion about these tests, so it is important to sort out the facts.
Sign in as a member for details about at-home COVID-19 tests (such as BinaxNOW, CareStart, ClearDetect, CLINITEST, Ellume, Flowflex, INDICAID, iHealth, InteliSwab, QuickVue, and others), including information to answer the following questions:
- What types of at-home COVID tests are available?
- Which COVID-19 home (antigen) tests are best?
- Which COVID-19/Flu tests are best?
- How should antigen tests be used?
- What should you do after testing for COVID?
- How long do antigen tests last, and how should they be stored?
- What should you know about counterfeit at-home tests?
- How can you get free at-home COVID-19 tests?
- Are antibody/serology tests similar to at-home tests?
Join today to unlock all member benefits including full access to all CL Answers and over 1,400 reviews.
Join NowAlready a member? Sign In Here.
Join now at www.consumerlab.com/join/
Carolyn21018
November 03, 2024You can buy a box of 5 Flowflex covid tests (not the combo w/flu) for about $30 on Amazon
Reply to this post…
Shanti
November 01, 2024According to the info in this article, the free tests I received (Osang Healthcare) from the US government are among the LOWEST accuracy!! I'm going to buy some FlowFlex tests. I have no financial interest in these or any other test kits.
Reply to this post…
Leslie Blum13580
January 02, 2024I was exposed to someone who tested positive and have been testing negative using Flowflex. Just to compare I used the test we just received from the government, AccessBio, which had what looked like a positive line at the full ten minutes. It was really faint, no color, just a shadow. Which one should I believe and which one should I use to test again today? It is quite difficult to get a PCR test in my neighborhood, which at this point is what I feel I should get. I should add that I have long-Covid so it’s really hard to know if I am symptomatic. No fever, no runny nose. It’s frustrating that it’s so hard to get a PCR test now.
False positives are relatively unlikely, especially if you're symptomatic. Therefore, if you tested positive on your most recent test, you are likely infected, even if the line was faint.
Reply to this post…
Thank you Dorothy, we're glad it was helpful!
Reply to this post…
Dorothy13578
October 29, 2022Thank you for this excellent demonstration and explanation about the Covid tests. Very well done and much appreciated.
Reply to this post…
sls1964
July 23, 2022my daughter and her family had covid 3 weeks ago. they all tested + for 11 days. same with my brother.
Reply to this post…
David13571
June 07, 2022What about iHealth Covid 19 at home tests? They have been distributed for free at all Mont Co libraries for about a year. Results in 15 min after a nasal swab. I would love to know how accurate this test is.
A comparison of home antigen tests can be found in the following section of our article above: https://www.consumerlab.com/answers/how-and-where-to-get-tested-for-covid-19/covid-19-tests/#how-home-antigen-tests-compare.
Information about the iHealth test, in particular, can be found here: https://www.consumerlab.com/answers/how-and-where-to-get-tested-for-covid-19/covid-19-tests/#ihealth
Reply to this post…
P13568
June 06, 2022Any reports or research Consumer Lab has done on the at-home molecular tests for Covid-19? Apparently there are 3 that have FDA approval: Cue Health, Lucira Health and Detect. Would be very interested in ConsumerLab's Review. Thanks.
Please see the following section of our article above: https://www.consumerlab.com/answers/how-and-where-to-get-tested-for-covid-19/covid-19-tests/#how-home-pcr-tests-compare
P13570
June 10, 2022Thank you!
Reply to this post…
John13567
May 30, 2022I tried to order free test kits by mail from the government through the post office. Received automatic response refusing to ship to my home because I have a home office and they refuse to mail test kits to a business. Only been receiving residential mail here for 30 years. Filed a protest. Got an automatic response telling me that the post office is overworked and understaffed and they don't know when they will get back to me to resolve the issue. Sigh. I will buy the test kits from the pharmacy.
Reply to this post…
Barbara13565
March 18, 2022The first free test from the government I received was an iHealth but expires in June 2022. I just received the second free test from the government on 3/17/2022, it is a Clinitest from Siemens and it expires 12/2022. Hoping I don't need to use but nice to have on hand just in case.
Reply to this post…
Sandy13560
March 07, 2022I don't trust negative results on antigen tests. When on 1/23, my mildly-symptomatic husband tested positive with Abbott BinaxNOW, I tested negative. (He got a sotrovimab infusion from his hospital, which wanted him back at work ASAP). 2 days later, and starting to feel a bit "off," I tested negative with FlowFlex. 36 hrs. later, feeling a little scratchy-throated, I tested negative with OnGo. I awoke the next day with a low fever and a mildly sore throat--per OnGo, still negative. Next morning, with temp >100F, I went to my health system's immediate care clinic to be tested for flu (despite having had the flu shot, I thought I might have a strain not in this year's quadrivalent). PCR test 10 min. later came back neg. for flu but positive for COVID! Started Paxlovid that evening, asymptomatic again w/in 24 hrs. Tested negative on day 6 and again on day 10 with QuickVue
But then a month after my positive PCR and the day after eating salmon I'd defrosted in its wrapper before cooking--a botulism hazard, I then learned--I felt queasy with stomach pains, and a fever of 99.9-100.9F (depending on type of thermometer--ear, oral, non-contact). I wanted to rule out botulism. Still negative with QuickVue. My primary said to go back to the clinic, which refused to PCR-test me because they claimed I could still PCR-test positive for 90 days--long past recovery and my symptoms & fever were too mild for flu. After doing an EKG to rule out an atypical heart attack, they said it was probably a norovirus (food poisoning wouldn't have caused fever) or perhaps even hunger pangs (as my distress was bad enough to have robbed me of my appetite for >24hrs).
So I have very little faith in the accuracy of negative results on home antigen tests. BTW, at the end of Feb. we finally got our gov't freebies: two iHealth kits. They're staying in the closet.
Reply to this post…
Teresa13558
February 16, 2022I received the free government tests today - Clinitest.
Reply to this post…
Carol13556
February 12, 2022I received only two kits in the package, and they were from iHealth. I'd like to know if others have received less than four. I had purchased better kits, so I'm concerned more about a scam contractor. These were mailed by a firm in Topeka, Kansas.
Susan13557
February 13, 2022Each test kit contains 2 tests.
Reply to this post…
Jennifer13553
February 09, 2022I just received my government-distributed COVID tests. They're made by AccessBio
Thanks for posting. That is the CareStart test, also sold as On/Go, which we have reviewed above at https://www.consumerlab.com/answers/how-and-where-to-get-tested-for-covid-19/covid-19-tests/#on-go.
Reply to this post…
lindsay13551
February 06, 2022I got the free government test today - iHealth.
Thanks for letting us know. We've reviewed this test above at https://www.consumerlab.com/answers/how-and-where-to-get-tested-for-covid-19/covid-19-tests/#ihealth.
Reply to this post…
Sonya13549
February 04, 2022I received the AccessBio test kit free from my health insurance provider Anthem BCBS in the end of November. I have not used the kit and see that it has an expiration date of January 2022. What is the typical shelf life of an antigen test. Should I dispose of it now that it is February 4th?
If it has expired, you should not rely on the test. As discussed in our article above, each test manufacturer has determined the shelf-life of its own test. AccessBio, which is the same test as CareStart and On/GO, has a shelf-life of about 9 months from date of manufacture. Shelf-life among at-home antigen tests ranges from about 5.5 months to 12 months, depending on the brand, as we discuss here: https://www.consumerlab.com/answers/how-and-where-to-get-tested-for-covid-19/covid-19-tests/#shelf-life
Reply to this post…
Patrick13546
February 02, 2022I received the ihealth test from the federal government today, and my state (Colorado) also sending out at home tests, likewise sent me an ihealth test kit.
Reply to this post…
James13544
January 29, 2022Just received the free Government iHealth model ICO-3000 Antigen Rapid Test.
Reply to this post…
Patricia13542
January 28, 2022I received the Free U.S. Government tests yesterday. They were Roche At-Home tests made in Korea by SDBiosensor. The info. on the box indicates they should be stored between 36-86 degrees F and the test packets have temp. symbols. Since the temp. was 24 degrees when the box was delivered, I called Roche to see if their tests were now compromised. I was informed they factor in sustainability in cold weather shipments and the tests should be brought to room temperature before using.
Thanks for posting about that, Patricia! FYI, we have reviewed that test -- https://www.consumerlab.com/answers/how-and-where-to-get-tested-for-covid-19/covid-19-tests/#roche-at-home-test.
Reply to this post…
Lynne13540
January 27, 2022I just received the free tests sent out by the Federal government. They are iHealth Covid-19 Antigen Rapid Test. How reliable are they?
Hi Lynne - First, thanks for sharing which test you received. We are interested to know which tests are being provided by the government, as they have not announced the brands as far as we can tell. Yes, we have reviewed the iHealth antigen test in the answer above. Although not among our Top Picks, it is certainly a good test. It's just slightly more likely than some other tests to report a false positive. The details are here: https://www.consumerlab.com/answers/how-and-where-to-get-tested-for-covid-19/covid-19-tests/#ihealth
Reply to this post…
CatW
January 14, 2022With so many variables, which PCR test and antigen test would you use for yourself?
Please see our Top Picks identified in the article above (full version for CL members).
Sandra Collins
January 30, 2022We have 4 boxes of Binax tests which have an expiration date of 3/24/22 that we bought in the summer. Really surprised that the tests expire so soon. Can we use the test after the expiration date since they are so expensive and hard to get and if we can how long after expiration date? Thank you and love CR!
If it has expired, you should not rely on the test. As discussed in our article above, each test manufacturer has determined the shelf-life of its own test. Shelf-life among at-home antigen tests ranges from about 5.5 months to 12 months, depending on the brand, as we discuss here: https://www.consumerlab.com/answers/how-and-where-to-get-tested-for-covid-19/covid-19-tests/#shelf-life
Reply to this post…
gary13530
January 14, 2022When my brother told me a friend of his was sick and did not know whether he had covid or the flu, I asked why doesn’t he get tested? My brother claims that covid tests cannot always discriminate between covid and the flu. I have never seen any evidence to support a potentially baseless claim. What are the facts on this question?
You are correct - this is a false claim. The rapid antigen and rapid PCR tests look specifically for the coronavirus (which causes COVID) and won't show positive for the flu, which is caused by a different type of virus. If you look at the documents for these tests, you'll see that they are tested, before being authorized by the FDA, to see if they pick up a wide range of other viruses and pathogens and they do not. There are, however, some laboratory-based PCR tests that intentionally look for both COVID and flu, but most do not.
Reply to this post…
Sam**99
January 02, 2022I have been searching the web and cannot find an answer to my question. I have a special needs brother being taken care of by an incompetent healthcare company where the aides do not wear masks and do not make my brother wear a mask or his roommate. I caught them all not wearing masks during a visit I made to the house. My brother had a breakthrough case of covid while being vaccinated with 2 Pfizer shots, but was not taken to get the booster when he clearly needed it. He got covid with Delta being the prominent type in our area. He then had a monoclonal antibody treatment. If he gets covid again, with probably the Omicron variant, how can he be tested to see if he has a current case of covid? Which tests should he take to make sure he doesn’t have an active case? He is coming to live with us and our household has been isolating and fully boosted since the start of the pandemic. Thanks
Sorry to hear that. Best way to test before he comes would be with an antigen test (which take only about 15 minutes) or rapid PCR test, so you'll know his status as of the time he's coming. Our article above indicates which tests have been shown be to most accurate to-date. Also, as discussed in our article, since antigen tests can miss early infection, a negative antigen test would need to be repeated within three days, but at least 36 hours later, and also be negative.
Reply to this post…
Bill13517
December 19, 2021Thanks for the overall guidance on the plethora of tests available.
Reply to this post…
Dean13514
December 03, 2021I had a false positive with the Quidel QuickVue, confirmed by three subsequent negative tests on the same day - the Abbott BinaxNOW, and both a rapid and a PCR through a local clinic.
sue13515
December 24, 2021Thanks for posting.
Reply to this post…
Katherine13507
December 03, 2021If I have no symptoms and no reason to suspect thatI've been infected, but want to be sure for being around someone vulnerable, should I take a test, and, if so, what kind?
Unless you have symptoms or believe you have been exposed, it's probably not appropriate to be tested.
Jeremy13512
December 08, 2021That's surprising, and seems contrary to many of the controls now in place to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Testing is often required prior to crossing borders, and many employers require asymptomatic employees to test regularly to avoid unknowingly infecting others. Given that a material portion of infected people never show symptoms, why would a PCR test (more likely than antigen to show a positive result for asymptomatic) not be a appropriate in a high-risk setting?
If you have been in a high risk setting, then there is reason to suspect infection and it would appropriate to get tested.
Reply to this post…
eve13499
August 09, 2020personally, i would not trust what the company says about their tests, given the ginning up of cases.
Reply to this post…
Jennifer13497
August 01, 2020The InBios website shows that sensitivity and specificity are 97.8% and 98.9%, respectively, whereas you have it listed as 100% for both. Has there been an update I'm unaware of?
Thank you for providing this excellent information!
https://inbios.com/scov-2-detect-igg-elisa-kit-2/
You are correct that the information provided by the company, based on it own tests, show it to be somewhat less accurate than the results from independent testing by the U.S. government, which are the results we show in the the article above.
Reply to this post…
Jane13494
July 29, 2020Is it true that Covid 19 anti body tests can come back positive if one has had a recent common cold?
It’s possible that a COVID-19 antibody test with low specificity may detect or show positive results for other viruses that can cause respiratory infections (including colds), such as other coronaviruses. However, this should not occur with COVID-19 antibody tests shown to have 100% specificity. See our table for the best antibody tests, i.e., those with 100% specificity and sensitivity.
Reply to this post…
esther13491
July 15, 2020Do any of the more accurate antibody tests provide the consumer with a specific number related to antibody levels? Or all they all positive/negative/inconclusive?
We've added information about this; see "Types of COVID-19 Tests -- Antibody test" in the answer above.
Reply to this post…
Doug13487
July 12, 2020Is this statement from above accurate?
Note that in a population where few people (e.g., 5%) actually have antibodies, a test that is not at 100% on specificity, such as the test from Healgen that provides 97.56% specificity and 100% sensitivity, a positive result may only be correct 67.8% the time, although a negative result would nearly always be correct.
If specificity is 97.56% why only correct 67.8% of the time?
A good way to understand this is to imagine, for example, a population in which no one is infected. If a test is less than 100% specific, it will sometimes show a positive result when a person is negative. Consequently, a positive result would actually be wrong 100% of the time. So, you can see how, with a test with 97.56% specificity, positive results would be wrong 67.8% of the time in a population where few people have the virus.
Reply to this post…
Lori13485
July 12, 2020Can you talk about test results coming back "inconclusive" for Covid?
Although the U.S. CDC does not post guidance regarding inconclusive results, the National Health Service in the UK explains the following: "An unclear, void, borderline or inconclusive result means it's not possible to say if you had coronavirus when the test was done. Get another coronavirus test as soon as possible if this happens. If you had a test because you had symptoms, you must keep self-isolating and have another test within 5 days of your symptoms starting." (https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/testing-and-tracing/get-an-antigen-test-to-check-if-you-have-coronavirus/)
Reply to this post…
Lazar13483
July 12, 2020My daughter and her husband both were sick with covid-19 and now, two month later both tested positive for covid anti-body. However, among their small children who did not have any symptoms, only one out of three tested has anti-body. Which seems to confirm that asymptomatic people don't develop AB.
There several reasons why someone may get a negative result with a COVID-19 antibody test. Please see "What Does a Negative Antibody Test Mean?" in the answer above.
Reply to this post…
Adriane13479
July 08, 2020Would you please offer information on the differences found in the saliva tests versus the blood testing?
Please see the information about saliva tests in the "Finding the Best COVID-19 Test -- Virus Test" section in the answer above.
Reply to this post…
jirayr13475
July 08, 2020Co-Diagnostics company in Utah has a 100% sensitivity and specificity test for Covid-19.
The FDA lists their virus test (not an antibody test) as authorized and, according the data submitted by the company to the FDA, it does appear to be highly sensitive and specific.
Reply to this post…
Alexandra13472
July 08, 2020Hi, do you know if people that have the antibody (have been infected), have been re-infected again with the virus?
According to the CDC: "We do not know the degree to which previous COVID-19 illness protects against a subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection or for how long persons are protected. Currently, serologic testing cannot be used to determine if this person may be reinfected. A positive serologic test may be evidence of the prior infection, but it remains unknown to what degree persons with detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies are immune to reinfection." (See https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/faq.html).
Reply to this post…
Susan13470
June 14, 2020Which tests are being used by Verily (Project Baseline )? I’m curious to their quality compared to some of the other tests you mention.
Project Baseline, run by Verily, is a system for setting up sample collections and getting results to patients. Likely some population data analysis as well. Each site may use a different lab and virus test -- all appear to be PCR based, i.e., looking for the genetic material of the virus. The project is focused on testing people for the virus, not antibodies. Hope that helps. For more information, see this page: https://kstatic.googleusercontent.com/files/9e312e8f06b6da01f1fda3e0f52d0622a3e51dcdf5afe3d085a232f66098e17b18b31cf67cbee029ff0796bacbfb21af88c099d63a60ec0c1bd3ca4bb4bc3713
Reply to this post…
Alan13467
June 11, 2020Isn't Covid-19 too new of a disease that it is unknown that even if you have the presence of antibodies to the virus it does not indicate immunity?
It's still an open question, but the antibodies likely indicate some level of immunity. Not the kind of thing that can be ethically tested in a clinical study on people, so we need to wait for enough population-based data over time to know for sure.
Reply to this post…
Nora13461
June 10, 2020You are doing a wonderful job in covering various important aspects of this corona virus epidemic, including evaluating protective gear, testing, benefits of supplements. This is information people really want to know, and you assemble this in a very helpful way. I am grateful for your extended coverage from supplements to other aspects of protecting our health and increasing our knowledge of what is available.
Thank you for letting us know!
Catherine13463
August 18, 2020Agreed,
Jamie13464
December 23, 2020More thank you’s from here.
Leon13462
January 16, 2022I am grateful as well. It can all be so confusing
Reply to this post…
Cynthia13459
June 10, 2020This page should be available to the public as a public service, not just to those of us who subscribe to CL. If it were, I would post a link to it on Facebook etc. -- which would be advertising for CL. Please consider this.
A free version of this page is available to non-members, but additional information (regarding identification of the most accurate antibody tests and where to get them) does require CL membership. Membership funds our ongoing work.
Reply to this post…
Gene13457
June 10, 2020Mayo Clinic says they’ve developed their own approved tests and I know specimens are being sent there from other states. Are those tests in this table?
Please see our response on June 3 to a similar question in this section.
Reply to this post…
hilary13455
June 10, 2020Greetings! What a remarkably clear, concise and helpful article - very impressive! I have been looking for this kind of summary with no luck until now. Thank you!
Thank you for your kind words. We're glad you're finding it helpful.
Reply to this post…
zendra
June 01, 2020I had tried in past to understand these concepts, but it was murky. I finally watched this video and understood this important info about the accuracy and usefulness of the new antibody tests. this is first explanation of the issue (and math) and what it means that is so clear that I could understand it.
"There is new information from the CDC that COVID 19 antibody testing in populations with a low prevalence of infection results in a high number of false positives (even if the test has a specificity of 95%). Dr. Seheult illustrates why the positive predictive value (and negative predictive value) are generally more helpful than sensitivity and specificity alone (This video was recorded on May 28, 2020) "
Coronavirus Pandemic Update 76: Antibody Testing False Positives in COVID-19 - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSRK41UbTEU&list=TLPQMjgwNTIwMjAxOSFRpLFKrQ&index=3
Keep in mind that the real probability of a test result being correct for an individual is best determined by the particular circumstances of that individual, as well as the sensitivity and specificity of the test used. For example, has the person exhibited signs of the disease or not, or have they been in high-risk situations or not. The positive and negative predictive values are based on disease prevalance in the population, which won't necessarily reflect the circumstances of the individual. A general discussion about this is found on Wikipedia at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-_and_post-test_probability.
Reply to this post…
zendra
June 01, 2020Which antibody test is being used in Minnesota by Mayo Clinic? I thought it was a serum test that Mayo developed themselves, but I do not recognize a Mayo test in your list. thanks for tracking this info. I had searched online and found this info on sensitivity and specificity impossible to locate for each test.
Mayo Clinic seems to be using an antibody test (for IgG) from Epitope Diagnostics, Inc, according to this page: https://www.mayocliniclabs.com/test-catalog/Overview/609035. Currently, this test has not been evaluated by the FDA but is allowed, as it has been filed with the FDA -- you can find it on the list we discuss above. It seems to have been tested by researchers in Germany who found it to have 100% sensitivity (so no false negatives) although only 88.7% specificity (so some false positives) -- see the study at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189838/. So, if you have antibodies to the virus, it will detect them. However, there's a small chance that a positive result is incorrect.
Reply to this post…
Iver13449
May 31, 2020Thanks for synthesizing this information in one place! When we say a test is for example 95% sensitive we mean that of 100 people *known for certain to have a disease*, the test correctly identifies 95 of them (95% true positives). Saying this implies there's a test or situation that is by definition always correct (a gold standard to which other tests are compared). What's the gold standard for COVID-19 antibody testing? For example, might we find 100 people who had positive PCR tests (and a consistent clinical picture), then do antibody tests on them 3 or 4 weeks later? If 95 of them had a positive antibody test, would we say that particular antibody test was 95% sensitive? (And would specificity be established in the same way - find 100 people with consistent negative PCRs and no symptoms, and then some weeks later if 5 of them had antibodies would we say the test was 95% specific?). I asked an epidemiologist this question and they agreed it could be done this way but they weren't sure that was how labs actually got their sensitivity and specificity figures. Thank you!
The best explanation of how sensitivity and specificity are being measured with COVID-19 antibody tests is that provided by the FDA on the page we linked to above (full version): "The performance of these tests is described by their "sensitivity," or their ability to identify those with antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 (true positive rate), and their "specificity," or their ability to identify those without antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 (true negative rate). A test's sensitivity can be estimated by determining whether or not it is able to detect antibodies in blood samples from patients who have been confirmed to have COVID-19 with a nucleic acid amplification test, or NAAT. In some validation studies of these tests, like the one FDA is conducting in partnership with NIH, CDC, and BARDA, the samples used, in addition to coming from patients confirmed to have COVID-19 by a NAAT, may also be confirmed to have antibodies present using other serology tests. A test's specificity can be estimated by testing large numbers of samples collected and frozen before SARS-CoV-2 is known to have circulated to demonstrate that the test does not produce positive results in response to the presence of other causes of a respiratory infection, such as other coronaviruses."
Reply to this post…
william13446
May 27, 2020Excellent description of testing issues!
Folks mostly do not understand prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, and sero-conversion.
bill g, mph
Thanks. We're staying on top of this area, continually updating.
Reply to this post…
Jennifer13443
May 18, 2020I've seen no mention anywhere of whether biotin supplementation will interfere with some of the antibody tests. I assume it's possible since Troponin, thyroid hormones, Hep A, B, and C antibody tests can be falsely negative if a patient is consuming biotin.
Large doses of biotin may interfere with COVID-19 antibody tests. We've added a note about this in the answer above. For information about biotin interference with other types of tests, see the Biotin section of the B Vitamin Supplements Review https://www.consumerlab.com/reviews/review-best-b-vitamins-and-complexes-energy-b6-b12-biotin-niacin-folic-acid/bvitamins/#kummer.
Reply to this post…
Mark13440
May 14, 2020Hoping there will be a review of the Quest antibody test.
As noted above, QuestDirect has stated that it is using the Abbott Architect and EUROIMMUN systems. The results for each are shown above in the "Finding the Best COVID-19 Test" section.
Reply to this post…
J.Claire13438
May 13, 2020This is very interesting: the base rate fallacy, I admit I had never heard of it, but then I avoid statistics if I can. Does this mean even a antibody test 100% both sensitive and specific will have false positives?
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/13/opinion/antibody-test-accuracy.html?referringSource=articleShare
"Just Because You Test Positive for Antibodies Doesn’t Mean You Have Them"
In a population whose infection rate is 5 percent, a test that is 90 percent accurate could deliver a false positive nearly 70 percent of the time.
A test that is 100% sensitive and specific should not create false negatives or false positives (if done correctly), regardless of the prevalence of disease in the community. But it is true that when the prevalence of a disease is low (i.e., few people have it), a test that not 100% specific could falsely identify more people as positive who are actually negative than who are actually positive.
Reply to this post…
Doug13435
May 13, 2020Although this may not be your area of expertise, I'm looking for reasons why and why not to get a voluntary test. I'd like to know if I've been exposed, but if I was then what could happen to me? What could I be forced to do?
There is a story that anybody positive for COVID cannot join the military. I recall a reluctance in the population to be tested for HIV many years ago.
These are good questions with both medical and ethical implications and beyond the scope of this article. However, regarding your question about preclusion from military service, this appears to only be true if one has been hospitalized with COVID-19, not just for having tested positive for the virus or antibodies, as noted an article in Stars and Stripes on May 8: https://www.stripes.com/news/us/contracting-coronavirus-won-t-disqualify-you-from-serving-in-the-military-but-a-hospital-stay-for-it-might-1.628995
Reply to this post…
Lazar13433
May 13, 2020You mentioned that some anti-body tests were approved by EU. Which ones? Are they available for purchase in U.S. for home use?
We have added a link to a list of tests that conform to the European standards and have the CE mark. Those tests may or may not be available in the U.S., although some have received both FDA allowance and the CE mark. See the full section, Finding the Best COVID-19 Test.
Reply to this post…
Jimmy13428
May 13, 2020I had the virus for 5 weeks, even though I had 3 negative tests. I took my first test at the 2 1/2 week mark, nasal rapid test swab and it was negative. I continued to have symptoms and then 1 1/2 weeks later I took a 2nd swab test that got sent to the lab, negative again. At the 5 week mark, I got a blood test with Quest and it came back negative that I never had the virus or antibodies.
I know I had the virus as the symptoms were it to a T. How can we rely on any of these tests?
Gwendolyn13432
May 27, 2020All of the usual viruses (influenza, etc) are still out there. According to one source, around 50% of the people who were absolutely SURE they had had COVID-19, did not have any antibodies. A PCR test for Covid-19 would not diagnose other viral infections.
Eve13429
May 27, 2020I had a similar experience. I then realized that I take a lot of supplements including Vit B Complex and other supplements which contain biotin which CAN cause the COVID tests and antibody test to not work correctly. Do you take supplements for nails and hair or others that may contain high levels of biotin?
Jimmy13430
June 10, 2020I was actually taking a biotin supplement, which I stopped recently.
Mary13431
July 08, 2020According to a recent article on CBC.CA, the tests used in Canada (PCR) are at BEST 80% accurate. That's a false negative one out of five times. And that's at the height of symptoms (somewhere around day 7 ). Accuracy decreases thereafter to something like 40% or even less.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/coronavirus-test-false-negative-1.5610114
Reply to this post…
Jim13424
May 13, 2020Is it possible to get the virus sickness twice?
A big question, but there is no definitive answer as of yet.
Sandy13426
May 17, 2020Hi: Looks like you can get reinfected according to this NPR article about sailors. "The U.S. Navy says 13 sailors from the USS Theodore Roosevelt who had apparently recovered from the coronavirus and had received negative test results have now tested positive for a second time.
In a statement released earlier on Saturday when five sailors were found to have retested positive, the Navy said the sailors had "met rigorous recovery criteria, exceeding CDC guidelines," including testing negative for the virus at least twice, but have now retested positive. The statement said the sailors had been monitoring their health and adhered to social-distancing protocols while on board the Roosevelt, which has been docked in Guam following an outbreak infecting hundreds of crew members.
"These five Sailors developed influenza-like illness symptoms and did the right thing reporting to medical for evaluation," the statement said.
The Navy has since confirmed to NPR that an additional eight sailors have retested positive for coronavirus, bringing the total to 13." https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/05/16/857379338/5-uss-roosevelt-sailors-test-positive-for-covid-19-again
Reply to this post…
Marsha
May 11, 2020I read your article about covid tests. I know someone who had symptoms and had 2 negative tests. She had trouble breathing and went to the hospital on Sat. Had a negative test and they sent her home. She went back to the hospital Sunday and died there.
Someone my daughter knows had a negative test and then tested positive and died. Makes me worry that these tests aren’t accurate. What do you think?
Very sorry to hear that. It could have been the type of tests used, the timing of them (too early or too late), or, as you note, the accuracy of the specific tests.
Brenda13422
June 29, 2020My Abbott antibody test was negative. Was it too late to take the test? It has been 3 months since I had very minor but untested symptoms. My Doctor said almost all the tests are coming in negative. What is going on??
We've added information about this in the section "What Does a Negative Antibody Test Mean?" in the answer above.
Reply to this post…
JR
May 10, 2020I would like to see your comments as to whether the antibodies actually offer protection from reinfection or not. Many are reporting/speculating that with rapid mutation and reported reinfections that we still are not sure about protection .
We, like you, also await definitive evidence on this question.
Caroline13418
July 29, 2020Can you find information for us about T-cell immunity? How to get tested for it? Who is doing good research about it?
Information about T-cell immunity in COVID-19 is already found in our answer above, but there are currently no commercially available tests. Should one become available and be authorized for use by the FDA, we will add information about it.
Reply to this post…
Brian13414
May 10, 2020Which antibody tests have received approval vs. EUA? There is a list for EUA companies but I have not found the list for approvals.
At this time, the FDA has not approved or authorized tests for COVID-19 virus or antibodies, it has only issued Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA) for such tests.
Reply to this post…
Judith13405
May 10, 2020I've heard that the nasal swab is very painful. Is the saliva swab just as good?
A nasopharyngeal swab, in which a long swab is inserted far back through your nose, can be very uncomfortable. A nasal swab would not go far back and would cause little discomfort. Research is showing saliva to provide a sample that may be just as useful, although most tests at this time are based on nasopharyngeal or nasal samples.
Brian13409
May 11, 2020A nasal swab should not be painful when using proper technique. One generally needs a tissue and may sneeze and/or laugh from the experience.
Kirk13408
November 23, 2020Given the low accuracy of the Abbott ID Now test, would you not recommend anyone use this test, if offered?
As discussed above, it seems to be somewhat less sensitive than other authorized PCR-based tests, i.e., it is more likely to yield a false negative result. If a person is showing symptoms and other test options are not available, it may be worth using, but, otherwise, it would seem better to use a more sensitive test.
Reply to this post…